Just to be aware, it's the first 30ft, minus any amount of level tip.
"The AFTM is a scale of line weights. The heavier the line, the greater the AFTM number. The manufacturers weigh the first 10 yards excluding the level tip and rate the line according to the table."
AFTM 3 | 6.48g |
AFTM 4 | 7.78g |
AFTM 5 | 9.07g |
AFTM 6 | 10.42g |
AFTM 7 | 11.99g |
AFTM 8 | 13.61g |
AFTM 9 | 15.55g |
AFTM 10 | 18.14g |
AFTM 11 | 21.38g |
AFTM 12 | 24.62g |
Not all scales discount the tip- this is where it gets messy- discounting the tip is a modern thing brought about by some makers to justify their lines being half to one rating heavier.
Read this-below- it’s a bit complex, but very true
Modern carbon rods have virtually zero tolerance on moving up or down line weights much. Modern Glass rods however will handle a very wide range of line weights.
A friend of mine in the tackle industry went to a demo last Summer where they tested how rods performed on higher and lower lines over rod ratings - as much as +/- #7 Something you wouldn’t ever do in practice, but the carbon rods all failed miserably- they wouldn’t load if underlined or overloaded very quickly if over lined. The glass rods coped and threw decent loops well over & under.
I’m sadly old enough to remember when fly rods would have a 5/6/7/8 rating and beachcasters 4-8 ounce ratings- they were fast taper glass and handled the wide variant, carbon needs a much more precise load rating to work well.
Fly line design has been lacking for over 30 years starting with the outdated AFTM system. Why don't companies change their head length in single hand ranges? Wy do companies only list the weight of the first 30' of a line? All these issues are questioned by designer Tom Bell in this modern...
sunrayflyfish.com