Fly Fishing Forum banner

Glass in the Salt

949 views 2 replies 3 participants last post by  Sash  
#1 ·
I like the slow action of glass rods. I'm tempted to pick up an 8Wt to try in the salt both here and in tropical waters. Any one given glass in the Salt a try ?

thanks
 
#2 ·
In the 60- 70's Lefty Kreh, John Goddard and everyone else used 9-10' reservoir rods ( glass-fibre ) and yes Goddard used a kingsize Intrepid Rimfly reel and an 8 wf....sort of Grafham by sea.
My father used an 11' Wye in the 1950's ( a sort of early cane switch rod!) on Christmas Island while checking thermo-nuclear warfare, between racing coco-nut crabs and fishing .

So with patience surely you can seek out tales of Bones and Permit pre Nautilus / Sage Salt
 
#3 · (Edited)
I started SWFF when I was a child, fishing for sea trout in the west of Ireland. I followed Falkus pretty much to the letter, so fished with a 10ft 6" Hardy Invincible, and slow sinker. It worked great, and I caught sea trout (on Sunk Lures) mackerel and bass consistently. Later "graduated" to various Hardy Fibalites and Bob Church rods: absolutely Meyre's "Grafham by Sea"!

I know fibreglass has got a LOT better, but so has graphite: I simply wouldn't ever go back, even for the nostalgia. There are fewer fish in the sea, and the conditions that I fish in West Wales typically need quite heavy and/or high density lines, turning over big (and sometimes very heavy) flies in high winds, and managing the line in strong swell.

I think here in the UK we make life quite hard for ourselves just doing SWFF. Personally, I think using sub-optimal tackle (i.e. a soft/slow glass rod; my go-to lines are a #10 intermediate and a 350g sinker) is a handicap too far: I am just not a good enough caster for it to be worth it.

(For the record, I LOVE glass for rivers and streams, and have two: a Hardy and a Maxcatch. The letter is actually the better rod for me!)